Weird Tales, April 1939 blurb Robert E. Howard, at the time of his tragic death, was working on a new novel for Weird Tales. He had completed a rough first draft, and nearly completed a revision which was to be his final version. . . . So engrossing is this story, Almuric, that Weird Tales would not be playing fair with you, the readers, if we did not let you see it. Therefore we have pieced together the nearly completed final draft that Howard wrote with the final pages of Howard’s rough first draft, which contains a smashing denouement. (page 152)
This statement leaves open several questions. Who did the
editing? Why? And what precisely was done to Howard’s
texts?
Holmes makes many significant points—that Wright is probably
guilty of editorial fabrication when claiming that Almuric was being written for Weird
Tales (according to Holmes’s analysis it probably dates to early 1934, two
years before Howard’s death); and that
the ending seems “almost criminally anti-Howardian” and that it exhibits
“a sudden sea-change of style and theme of a sort unique in all of Howard’s
work—the last chapter blithely undoes it all, giving us a finale filled with
peace, brotherhood, and eternal friendship among formerly fierce, barbaric
enemies” (page 17). Holmes argues that
the person who edited the text was unlikely to be either Farnsworth Wright (perhaps
due to advancing Parkinson’s), or Otis Adelbert Kline (who took only a ten
percent commission as agent, and not the fifty percent commission he would have
taken had he done the job), and considers some other authors, settling at last on
Kline’s friend, Otto Binder, primarily for stylistic reasons.
The recent discovery of a typed letter settles the question
of who, and some of the reasons for why.
In brief, it was Farnsworth Wright who did the editing. On January 4, 1939, Wright wrote to Sam
Moskowitz, giving information on future stories in Weird Tales, noting:
Beginning in the May issue, we are printing a posthumous interplanetary novel by Robert E. Howard, entitled “Almuric.” At the time of his death, Mr. Howard had completed a first draft of the story, and had done the greater part of the second draft. The novel is so striking that I thought it would be unfair to our readers if we did not give them a chance to read this. So I pieced together an ending from the first draft and used it to complete the second draft to make a complete story.
So there we have it. Who?
Farnsworth Wright. Why? Ostensibly to share the story, which Wright
apparently admired, with the Weird Tales
readership, but doubtless also to be able to parade Robert E. Howard’s name and
writing in the magazine once more.
What precisely Wright did to Howard’s text will likely never
be known. Howard often wrote multiple
drafts of his stories, so the idea of a second draft being a final draft is not
necessarily true. Howard seems to have
abandoned the story himself, for whatever reasons, and moved on to other
things. One aspect of the ending (the strong-man-gets-the-pretty-girl)
is at least foreshadowed throughout the text as published. Almuric
as a story is somewhat indebted to the works of Edgar Rice Burroughs, and such
an ending is not unlike what is found in Burroughs (and also found in the
pastiches of Burroughs by Howard’s agent, Otis Adelbert Kline). Perhaps Howard
originally wrote such an ending in his rough first draft, and as he worked on
his second draft he could not see his way to a more typical Howardian ending,
and thus the story was abandoned.
The easy solution would be to blame the editor for the
ending, as Holmes does primarily on stylistic points, but there is no actual evidence
that Wright wrote or tampered much with the text. By Wright’s own words there was a complete
first draft, and a “nearly completed” (per the note in Weird Tales) second draft, or one with “the greater part” (per
Wright’s letter to Moskowitz) of the second draft being written. In both sources Wright states that he “pieced
together” an ending from the first draft to complete the second draft. On the
other hand, Holmes’s stylistic analysis of the final chapter is cogent and
persuasive. Unfortunately the facts of whatever actually happened in the
editing process are apparently lost to history.
Very interesting. In that letter we definitely have a smoking gun.
ReplyDeleteCase well made. Thanks
ReplyDelete